The Cause No 1:Unavodable factors:-
.
For instance : Drugs for epilepsy, different preexisting infection, asthma, chronic cardiovascular
disorder antihypertensive, Aantidiabetics, anticoagulants etc ). Many of these
exposures are not readily avoidable, as pregnancy is often not planned or
recognized for an extended period after conception, or because there is a
continuing need for maternal treatment for health conditions (e.g. epilepsy,
infection, asthma, chronic cardiovascular disorders).
Exposure to various agents in the home
or workplace, Fear of loss of job: A compromise !!! or as a
consequence of maternal lifestyles and self-medication, is almost universal,
and pre-conception planning only rarely provides an opportunity to identify
exposures of concern. As a consequence, questions about the significance of
such an exposure, whether stated or not, are often a source of concern to
pregnant women or their care provider.
What are other developmental toxicants
?? Not all yield t in permanent adverse outcomes for the fetus or newborn.
Some agents may have at least partially reversible or transient effects if
recognized early, such as fetal growth restriction from tobacco smoking. It is
important to recognize that structural birth defects resulting from exposure
to human teratogens are not the only manifestations of exposure to
developmental toxicants. Fetal or postnatal growth disorders, functional
developmental disorders including cognitive and behavioral deficits,
abnormalities of placental function putting the fetus at increased risk, and
death (embryonic, fetal, perinatal or postnatal) are all among potential
manifestations of expo
sures. Furthermore, some adverse outcomes may not become
apparent until many years later (e.g. reproductive consequences and cancer from
exposure to diethylstilbestrol).
Pathogenetic factors in evaluation of risk
from exposure to teratogens and other
developmental toxicants
When evaluating the likely significance of exposure to
potentially hazardous agents, it is essential to consider the following issues
in the context of the known or likely pathogenetic mechanisms for adverse fetal
outcomes.
In general, the larger the dose, the more likely an
effect, and the more likely the effect will be significant.
Likewise, the longer the duration of exposure, the
greater the chance that susceptible periods of organogenesis and development
will be encountered.
Timing of exposure is critical: certain organ systems may
have a limited period of susceptibility for damage.
Although it is commonly thought that damage can only
result during the period of organogenesis, i.e. during the first trimester,
this is not correct. Some organ systems (e.g. the brain) undergo developmental
processes later in pregnancy and can be damaged throughout the prenatal period.
Teratogens and developmental toxicants produce their
adverse effect by specific mechanisms. As these mechanisms are often important
in multiple tissues and organs, it is not surprising that several specific
types of damage may result.
Those agents that affect basic morphogenetic processes
commonly are related to first trimester exposures. However, those agents which
act through mechanical pressures are likely to have the greatest impact during
the third trimester, and those agents that produce necrosis through
inflammation and/or hemorrhage can potentially destroy normally developing
structures throughout pregnancy.
Variability in the genetic factors related to metabolism
of drugs and chemicals may result in differential susceptibility of the host.
These pharmacogenetic factors must be expressed at a relevant time in the
tissue or organ system affected.
There are two potentially relevant 'hosts' to be
considered. Mother and embro/fetus only share 50% of the genome. Thus,
depending on the pathogenesis of the adverse outcome, maternal or fetal (or
perhaps both) genotype may be more important.
No comments:
Post a Comment