DNA. PCR
is super-sensitive, and will pick up the presence of even a few molecules of
mycobacterial DNA.
This technology amplifies
a DNA sequence which is unique to mycobacteria.
But quite often contaminations occur e.g. tap water, slides etc and giving a
false + ve DNA –PCR +ve. AS such, it is important to discriminate between true
infection and contamination. The molecular cross-reaction between the
ubiquitous non-pathogenic environmental mycobacteria (which are harmless
colonisers) and M tuberculosis is what creates the diagnostic dilemma. With a
positive TB PCR, the odds are that a positive result (in an asymptomatic
patient) means that there is something wrong with the test, not with the patient.
In fact, I think we should coin a new term for these mycobacteria which have
created so much iatrogenic harm - Non pathogenic Ubiquitous Mycobacteria - NUM!
Relevance
of PCR where do we stand today?? The
TB PCR test is highly flawed, because the DNA sequence which the PCR amplifies
is common to both the mycobacterium tuberculosis as well as the other species
of mycobacteria.
Since these mycobacteria are so common, when the laboratory
finds a positive PCR reaction , it doesn’t know whether the mycobacterial DNA is coming from the patient or from
the slide on which that sample was sent. Since they have a similar DNA
structure, the presence of either will provide a positive result in a PCR test.
The PCR test is quite a
dumb test - it's not able to determine which type of mycobacteria is providing
a positive signal!
Sadly, most gynecologists and pathologists are completely
clueless about the prevalence
of environmental mycobacteria; and when the TB PCR test result comes back as
positive, their knee jerk reaction is to assume that the patient has
genital TB ( when in reality, the result is much more likely to be a
false positive, because of contamination).
How many of us are aware of the terminology of Environmental
mycobacteria?? We live in India!!So we have to shut our clinics and read about
environments-Pollutants, Chemicals, Smokes prevailing in India!!
Environmental mycobacteria as because environmental mycobacteria
are so prevalent (they are found practically everywhere - even in the water in
the lab which is used to clean the instruments!), the chances of the PCR test
being positive because of contamination by environmental bacteria
is much higher than because the patient actually has genital TB!
Environmental
mycobacteria have always been around, so why wasn't this a problem in the past?
This is because modern PCR is so sensitive! In the past, it was not easy to
grow mycobacteria, which meant that even if a few contaminants were present in
the specimen, these would fail to grow. However, PCR is super-sensitive, and
will pick up the presence of even a few molecules of mycobacterial DNA.
With a positive TB PCR, the
odds are that a positive result (in an asymptomatic patient) means that there
is something wrong with the test, not with the patient. In fact, I think we
should coin a new term for these mycobacteria which have created so much
iatrogenic harm - Non pathogenic Ubiquitous Mycobacteria - NUM!
TB PCR positive
32yr old prim
infertility of 7yrs.many failed cycles of Biotic... endo TB PCR positive in Jan.pt started AKT
for. 2 months. No defaulted...pt came to me 2 days back with TB-PCR negative
dine 1wk back by another gynecologist. On advising to continue 2nd line AKT pt
unwilling due to severe vomiting...him 2 manage? Can I go ahead with HSG
without AKT?
·
.
Take home message:+U might know few pertinent points related to
Kochs—Just brush up your knowledge please; TB interferon not done. A) HSG
is usually forbidden in a case of presumed/confirmed case of genital Kochs.
But Lap is reasonably safe B) Secondly,
what U have diagnosed as Kochs may be misdiagnosed/
inappropriate... It is difficult to be
certain about Kochs as there is no specific serum marker... PCR ---so long we trusted so much has fallen
to disrepute. Therefore elusions/ dilemmas prevails more so with the presence of Environmental Acid fast Rod
shaped so many bacilli. C) Thirdly, it is our duty to refer to a Pulmologist and seek opinion about vomiting component if on ATD either in
Preg or nonpregnant state along with current LFT report and H/O other medicationswhile
on ATDunder your control.’.
No comments:
Post a Comment