How to define FGR : What is country, ethnicity and racial
gestational based –EFW (expected Foetal weight) ? Ans:-How many of your
sonologist friends supply growth chart along with sonography report pages?? We
know and aware that for every country
population standards is available as normal growth chart for normal growing
foetus in utero and plotted against the gest age. Local normal growth chart are
installed in the machine like PI,RI ,PSV of Doppler. Intra uterine growth
retardation (IUGR-now abbreviation is FGR)
is defined when the
intrauterine weight of the foetus falls
below the tenth percentile for gest
age ( ie. duration of pregnancy ) . However the cut off value of
diagnosis IUGR is 10th percentile weight for foetal age. Against the
standard week wt curve
The other definition of FGR?? The
other index of expressing IUGR is when the
estimated foetal weight falls below the two standard derivation below the mean
.
In
practice we come across :: Optimum Condition 1:
Dating USG was done and CRL matches with stated LMP:---> Thus the precondition of diagnosis of FGR demands accurate pregnancy dating (preferably on USG done at 6-10 weeks
of gestation) . Dating USG must be
done so that the present estimated
foetal ut can be compared with the reference chart and diagnosis or
exclusion of FGR can be made. Now for
every country population standards are
available. i e foetal weight for each gestational
age has been calculated and
available to sonographer . So before the
diagnosis of IUGR(FGR) is made LMP must be
known with certainly otherwise
false diagnosis of IUGR will be made.
In
practice we come across ::Suboptimum
Condition 2:--If
LMP is not certain or unreliable -> then at least
one obstetric USG carried
out at 16-18 week of gestation can also be
used as a reference value about the duration of preg ( I e preg dating )
In practice we come across :: Preg woman
coming to hospital at 28 weeks : Suboptimum Condition 3:-No sonography was done and a preg woman come to hospital for
booking only based on the fact that her admission to hospital will be refused
if she does not attend at least 2-3 times in ANC period. This information
may come from by the neighbors
or lady Health visitors or ASHA workers
. By the time she comes for first time it may be as late as 28-32 weeks,
At that time she is usually offered a
date for USG on which she may or may not turn up. However if USG is done at
early third trimester dating can be still be done from Trans cerebellar
diameter or femur length. But trans cerebellar dia is sadly ever mentioned by our sonologist.-
Assignment of
foetus as per FEW :-Weight wise classification
of Foetus while in utero:-
Average weight Foetus:--- - appropriate
for gest age ( Babies born with birth weight between the 10 th and 90th percentile for gest age
A)
Large
- Large for gest age
- Babies with birth weight about the 90th percentile
SAG foetus:- –
small for gest age ( < 10th percentile )
How to prepare the chart for local population which will
be representative? How to frame a chart?? How to local population based normal / standard
fetal weight as per gestational week?
To calculate this
( country wise ) 100/500 women with
known LMP - estimation
of foetal wt is done at
different gestational age is done.
Then these foetal weights are plotted against the gest weeks. These women must not have any
disease and birth wt after
delay should be normal . Thus these pregnancies are
essentially normal in all respects . This is also called
population standard or “ growth
curve “ or “ Reference Range “ . Thus if a foetus exhibits 5th percentile for
wt in a particular gest age ( say 34 weeks ) it means
only 5% of healthy women of that
locality with normal birth wt ( proved
later ) will have such foetal weight.
Which term is better ?
IUGR - Intra
uterine growth
SFD- Small for
date
Growth restricted
foetus
SGA – small for
gestational age . The term retorted foetus .
Why we have changed the 4 decade long terminology of IUGR
? We have moved to FGR-but why?? The very term FGR means some hurtful or rudeness,
offences, unacceptable or unsatisfying to the couple and family members as they
consider failure to gain weight is equated to irreversible brain changes of fetus and foots won’t be able
to catch up later even if born by CS which is far from truth !! But we know such
happening is not true, and fortunately
timely intervention will hopefully improve foeatal weight and seldom there will
be residual damage (delayed mile stones). Why we have changed to growth Retardation
to restriction?? Many women and their family members think that
retardation of foetus what have occurred in utero is irreversible . So
women & family
members got scared
of the term Retardation .As such the present
nomenclature of this entity is FGR
i.e.”Growth restricted foetus” . This means growth is temporally restricted which is correctable
by proper treatment and it is not a permanent / irreversible damage.
Caution: How sensitive is sonological measurements in diagnosing
FGR?? As many as 10-15 % of normal fetuses will exhibit abnormal USG parameter!!!
Reasoning:-
FGR can
manifest as less maternal weight gain, a decrease in uterine height,(SFH) , Abd
circumference of mother –girth in cm do not increase as per , clinically on palpation
Liquor may be less , with toned uterus(less relaxed) . So far as foetus is
concerned , USG may reveal its less subcut tissues
and muscle mass ( singly or in various
combination ) and usually AC as per gest age will be less . Ideally all these
sonographic metrics should be mentioned by
the sonologist such measurements should
be done to diagnose FGR. But in
practice all the diameters / circumferences
are not measured .Even if all the parameters are used , mentioned and used in calculating
EFW àthen
too there can be missing of some IUGR babies . By contrast if all the measurements are used then there is a possibility that 10-15
% of normal fetuses will exhibit abnormal
USG parameter .
How obstetricians
used to diagnose IUGR / SFD in the decal
of fifties / sixties when us was not
widely available in India ?
The then clinicians used to assess foetal
weight by the followings but
unfortunately in many cases the presumption of diagnosis of IUGR was
wrong even by the most experienced clinicians.
No comments:
Post a Comment