o
FGR in utero & correlation with development
of neurocognitive difficulties at
childhood?? Children with intrauterine
growth retardation demonstrated a specific profile of neurocognitive
difficulties at school age, accounting for lower school achievements. The best perinatal parameter predictive
of neurodevelopment and IQ was the Cephalization Index (P < .001). Somatic catch-up growth at
age 2 and at age 9 to 10 correlated with favorable outcome at 9 to 10 years of
age. Intrauterine growth–restricted children with a current head circumference
≤10th percentile had poorer outcomes. Conclusively, intrauterine growth
restriction has a negative impact on neurocognitive development. Slow postnatal
head growth is correlated with a poorer neuropsychological outcome.Evidence suggests that children are at risk for poorer
neurodevelopmental outcomes following IUGR from 6 months to 3 years of age. The
heterogeneity of primary outcomes, assessment measures, adjustment for
confounding variables, and definitions of IUGR limits synthesis and
interpretation. Sample sizes in most studies were small, and some examined
preterm IUGR children without including term IUGR or AGA comparison groups,
limiting the value of extant studies. Neuropsychological development and the impact of postnatal
head growth were studied in preschool children with asymmetrical intrauterine
growth restriction. Examinees born at term with a birth weight below the 10th
percentile were matched to the control group according to chronological and
gestational age, gender, and maternal education. Fifty children were in each
group, with a mean age of 6 years, 4 months. The Touwen neurological
examination, the Čuturić developmental test, an imitative hand positions test,
and a visual attention test were performed. There were significant differences
(P< .03) in motor
variables, the developmental quotient, and the imitative hand positions test.
Fine motor skills had the most discriminative power. Relative growth of the head
in relation to weight gain was positively correlated to neurocognitive outcome.
o
No comments:
Post a Comment