Q.1: In which diseases PCR
technology is used ?? Ans: PCR technology
is extensively used in analysing clinical specimens for the presence of
infectious agents, including 1) HIV, 2) hepatitis,3) human
papillomavirus ., 4) Epstein-Barr virus (glandular fever), 5) malaria and 6) anthrax.
Tuberculosis is a disease
caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis that
generally attacks the lungs however possibly can affect other parts of the body. Genital
tuberculosis (GTB) is a potent contributor to irreversible damage to the
reproductive system and infertility in females.
Female
GTB of the endometrium is a well-recognized entity in the etiology of
infertility, especially in TB endemic countries like India.
Q.2: Advantages of PCR technology?? Ans: The diagnosis is a challenge to the
clinician as it is mostly either asymptomatic or presents with nonspecific
symptoms in affected females.It could be observed through this study that 65%
of the cases of infertility were due to the tuberculous involvement of
endometrium. Schaefer and Onuigbo in their two different reports have shown an
involvement of ET in 50%–60% of the case
of FGB.
TB PCR is a rapid and reliable test in the
diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. The TB-PCR is one of the tests that helps
diagnose and confirm an infection of Tuberculosis. The hsp65 Nested PCR of MB can be used as a noninvasive screening test for
early diagnosis of GTB.
. Q.3: How there is subfertility due to genital Kochs?? Ans: Infertility might, be occurring due to disturbed implantation of
the developing embryo on the endometrium.
Early reproductive age is the most vulnerable period to acquire
GTB. This could be because of the fact that after puberty the blood supply to
the pelvic organs is increased resulting in more bacilli reaching and seeded in
the reproductive organs. Many researchers have studied this aspect of female
GTB comparing different diagnostic tests on ET and MB samples .Correct
diagnosis often relies on ET sample obtained by biopsy which is an invasive
procedure. But by contrast menst
blood(MB) as a sample in the detection
of endometrial TB has been used in many studies, but its utility over the
endometrial sample in detecting infection is still a subject to explore.
Q,.
4: So as on date , dilemma exists about which method is accurate so far exact diagnois
Is made with certainty. Therefore as no gold standard diagnostic tool is yet
available, clinical suspicion and relatively insensitive approaches such as A) histopathology,
B) laparoscopy and C) hysterosalpingogram
are currently critical determinants in the diagnosis of GTB.
Although a polymerase chain reaction
(PCR)-based assay using endometrial tissue seems promising, sampling does
require an invasive procedure.
Point 5: Points in favour
of PCR dependent diag in contrast to histology or Culture??The sensitivity and specificity of PCR were 93% and
84%, respectively. HIV status did not affect the sensitivity of PCR. A total of 99.7% of the true smear-positive and 82.1% of
the true smear-negative TB patients were
correctly identified by PCR.
Using Bactec 360 culture
as the gold standard, the overall sensitivity of TB PCR was 78.3%,
and for pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens it was
82.3% and 72.0%, respectively. However,
mycobacterial culture, which has the highest sensitivity for diagnosing and
confirming active TB, requires 2 to 6 weeks for interpretation Conclusions: TB PCR is a rapid
and reliable test in the
diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. Using
culture as the gold standard, the overall sensitivity of TB PCR was 78.3%,
and for pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens it was 82.3% and 72.0%,
respectively.:
The traditional less sensitive, time-consuming, and
labor-intensive methods, i.e., histopathalogical and mycobacteriological
examinations (smear and culture) in the diagnosis of TB are now been
overshadowed by more sensitive, rapid, and easier PCR-based methods.
Researchers have recommended direct molecular detection of MTC be used as an
adjunct to other methods of laboratory diagnosis of TB,
The specificity (82.9%) and sensitivity (72.3%) of the detection
of MTB from MB samples have been reported by various authors . Few studies have
reported the sensitivity range between 55% and 90% of the detection of MTB by
PCR from clinical specimens.
The limitations of the PCR techniques are the false-negative
results (more common with MB samples ) which can be attributed to either paucibacillary nature, or inefficient
extraction of the DNA from the sample. Thus, sampling plays an important role in the accuracy of
detection of GTB.
Since the involvement of the genital tract in TB could be
generalized or patchy, and the technique of sample collection is blind, there
is a possibility of missing the infected area when ET is collected. However,
the overall positivity rate of MB can be increased by repeated sampling over a
period of time. While multiple sampling for ET (invasive method) is not
feasible, a noninvasive sample like MB which can be taken during different
cycles and extracting DNA from a large volume of MB for PCR seems to be a
better specimen in these circumstances. An added advantage of MB sample is that
the MB can be collected undertaking sterile precautions by the patient itself
from the periphery and can be sent to the laboratory for further workup.
Our study is unique as we have assessed the utility of nested PCR
on MB over ET samples collected from the same patient. None of the studies
conducted so far have made a similar comparison to the best of our knowledge.
Nested PCR using MB as a sample has an insignificant difference with that of ET.
Thus, MB seems to have a practical utility in being a noninvasive test and
could be used as a preliminary screening test for diagnosis of GTB. On the
contrary, Q.8: What isnew method of diag of genital Kochs?? Ans :Patil et
al. in their study did not find MB to be a potential alternative clinical
sample in the diagnosis of endometrial TB. They had MB as well as endometrial aspirates tested by a commercial kit
GEN-PROBE AMPLIFIED M. tuberculosis direct test which is a
nucleic acid amplification test..
No comments:
Post a Comment