Saturday, 28 September 2019

GDM & DM newer agents & take home message

The  main advantages  of extenatide and Gliptins  over SUs are Lack of  weight  gain and hypoglycemic episodes. In addition in  experimental  animals long term  exposure  of these agents has led to some degree  of beta cell preservation Bea cell regeneration replication as well as  reduced  apoptosis have been  postulated SUs do not have  this properly Thus SUs  are expected  to be gradually   replaced by these agents particularly   in rich countries . Due to economic limitations only a small fraction of diabetics   can afford these expensive agents thus  time tested SUs will continue to remain once of the mainstay of oral anti diabetic therapy  in our country   for a long time to come. However  it should be noted that while SUs  have with stood the test of time these new agents are in clinical   use for  very short  time. Thus  it s a bit early to write  obituary of SUs and hail incretion mimetics  and DPPs  inhibitors  as great discoveries  and wonder  drugs. Type 3 Antidiabetic drugs:- OAD ( oral antidiabetic drugs)::_Thiazolidinedione
Glitazones work as insulin sensitizers. Like metformin they act only on peripheral tissues mainly  muscle  and fat cells  and increase their sensitivity to insulin. They do not increase  pancreatic insulin   secretion thus when  given alone or in combination with  metformin  they do not cause  hypoglycemia.
Their action is mediated  through activation of Par gamma activated intra nuclear receptors. The cellular site of action is predominantly adipocyte and muscle cells with some  action on hepatocytes Glitazones sensitize tissues  towards insulin and reduce  circulating  free fatty acid levels.
Rosiglitazone and Pioglitazone  were the two glitazones  available in  our country  till recently  In September 2010 the regulatory authorities of Govt  of India  banned rosiglitazone  following its  ban in advanc3ed countries . Both  have identical  mechanism of action and indications water retention leading  increased volume of fluid  in intra vascular  compartment is liable to occur  with both the  compounds. Precipitation  of incipient   cardiac failure has occurred with both the glitazones thus they  are contraindicated in those in cardiac failure or those who have history  of cardiac failure In addition a meta analysis  published in 2007   associated  rosiglitazone with higher   prevalence of myocardial   infarction and sudden cardiac death Pioglitazone  has a favorable  influence on plasma lipids and was  not associated   with increased prevalence of myocardial infarction or sudden   cardiac   deaths  in any of the clinical   trials  or meta analysis. The usual daily   dose of Pioglitazone is 15  to 45 mg in a single dose. Most of  the Indian authorities do not  prescribe  it beyond 30 mg /day  both  the  agents produce weight   gain  which  can be  as much as ten kegs in some patients.  The weight  gain is mainly due to water  retention  with some contributions from adipogenesiis  and weight  regain due to better metabolic  control . In those with  significant  edema or weight gain glitazones need to be  discontinued.
Indications :
1)           In predominantly insulin resistant type 2 diabetic patients Pioglitazone is used as an alternative to metformin particularly if the latter is not tolerated or contra indicated. It can also be combined with metformin when monotherapy with metformin fails to achieve glycemic targets.
2)           In combination with SUs or other insulin secretogogues when latter agents  alone are not sufficient  to control  blood glucose  level.
In triple drug  combination  along with any two from  SU metformin and gliptin group  in  groups when two  drug  therapy  fails to meet  glycemic targets  and the patient  is still some distance  away from end stage  beta cell  failure  . Experienced clinicians can make such a judgment
Uncommon agents: Quick Release  Bromocriptine  Tablets
Conventional  Bromocriptine has been  in clinical  practice  for more  than two decades  for the management  of parkinsonism and Galactorrhoea. Quick release  preparation of Bromocriptine has been introduced  in India  in mid 2010 and in USA in November  2010. It is indicated  in the management   of type 2 diabetes.
In type 2 diabetes dopaminergic tone in hypothalamic area  is reduced . This  is associated  with increased secretion of  noradrenalin in hypothalamic  hypophyseal axis  which in turn leads  to insulin resistance obesity  and hyperglycemia Bromocriptine is dopamine agonist Administration of quick  release version leads to rapid   buildup of its associated  with reduction in insulin  resistance and  improvement  in glycemic status  particularly post  prandial hyperglycemia.
Quick release  bromocriptine has better bio availability  than its  conventional version. It is available  in tablet  form  each tablet contains 0.8 mg of bromocriptine in special quick  release  formulation. The therapeutic   dosage  is 1.6  to 4.8 mg once daily  two hours after  getting  up in morning . preferably  after food. In order to avoid gastro intestinal  side effects treatement  should be started with 0.8 mg and dosage  should  be stepped up at weakly interval.
Quick  release  bromocriptine  is the first and so far only anti  diabetic medication which has successfully undergone  elaborate   pre marketing cardio  vascular safety studies  in USA. After the publication of report    of excess  cardio  vascular  mortality  with  rosiglitazone   in the  New  Engalnd   journal of medicine  in June   2007  Th US FDA has made  these tests  mandatory   for any new  and diabetic  agent  before  its introduction in the market.
Quick release   bromocriptine can be  used as one of the add on agents  particularly  in those  with manifestations of insulin resistance .
Tips from  Dr S K Pal in lieu of a good dinner : It is dinner time for this old man: send your delicious dinner sharp by courier . Clinical  applications of OADs
OADs are indicated in type 2 DM patients  when diet fails to control hyperglycemia. Stressful conditions  such as  severe  infections pregnancy and major  surgery  renal and hepatic  insufficiency are contra indications  to the use  of OADs These  drugs  do not work  in the absence  of insulin hence  should not be  used alone in Type 1 DM.
CRITERIA FOR  CONTORL
 One  should aim at total  freedom form  glycosuria  and steady  near normal blood glucose . Table 2 gives  criteria  for control

Note  : Criteria for control need to be modified as per the individual patient’s  situation
In elderly  people in those  who do not have warning  adrenergic symptoms  and in those with significant cardiovascular  affection with long standing diabetes less stringent criteria should be applied.
During  pregnancy   fasting and 2 hours  post prandial plasma  glucose  values  should be < 100 and 125 mg % respectively . In young  ad recently  diagnosed  diabetic  patients  generally aggressive criteria should be applied. Their  all the three  glycemic values i.e. fasting and post prandial plasma  glucose  values  and HbA1c  should be  at or very   near  lower  limit of the range  mentioned above.
Failure of control
 A common cause  of failure is inadequate   dietary regulations Some diabetes  are under the wrong  impression that since they are taking OAD they are  at liberty to eat anything  . In   addition  to review  of diet in patients   failing to respond  to  OAD a systematic   search for occult  infection   should be made.

It is also  advisable to thoroughly analyze all the medicines  he/ she is taking . In addition to medicines  prescribed by you he/ she  may be taking say for example steroids for asthma  strong  potassium wasting  diuretics like Fursemide  and Diphenythydanatoin  can also interfere with the action of OAD . If a  failure occurs  even after proper  dietary  regulations and maximal  dose of OAD  drugs  from other  groups  should be added and the dosage  gradually  increased  until  optimal  control is  achieved . After  a prolonged use for  several years   OAD  gradually start   losing  their  effect  and  ultimately a stage is reached  in many  patients  where a maximum dosage of combined agents  is also unable  to control  hyperglycemia and  . At this stage OAD should be replaced by insulin.
Side effects
Sulphonylureas : A number  of non specific gastrointestinal  symptoms ranging from dyspepsia to diarrhea occur with the sulphonylura in a small number   of patients  . A  variety of skin reactions also  occur . these are  mostly of minor  significance  and resolve  on drug cessation however  an  occasional   severe complication may arise such as exfoliative dermatitis or stevens Johnson syndrome. A cholestatic  type of jaundice is rarely seen as is bone marrow depression . water  retention   giving rise to delusional Hyponatraemia was  first described  with chlorpropamide  but has also  been reported  with other sulphonylureas Hypoglycemia should be regarded  as a consequence  of excessive  dosage rather  than as a side effect  unless due to drug  interaction
What about Biguanides(metformin- My fair lady!!) : Gastro intestinal side effects including  anorexia nausea and diarrhea occur in 10-15% of patients  and being dose dependent these may limit the opportunity  to employ  maximum dosage. Vitamin B12  deficiency  may result  from the effect of biguanides  on the dowel . In contrast  to the sulphonylureas  hypoglycemia  is rare  and usually is only reported with suicidal drug  use. We have already discussed  lactic acidosis.
Glitazones : Weight gain  swelling of feet  due to edema and cardiac  failure  when used  in patients  with left  ventricular  dysfunction are main side effects  Mild   anemia is also  seen This is due to dilution of blood following  increased  blood volume due to water  retention.
Alpha  Glucosidase Inhibitors : Abdominal  distention borbigmy  and diarrhea  are main  side effects.
DPPS inhibitors A variety  of skin  reactions are occasionally reported. These are  mostly of minor significance   and resolve  on drug cessation   however   an occasional   severe  complication  such as  exfoliative dermatitis or Stevens johnson  syndrome  has been reported  in those  on sitagliptin Rare  cases of pancreatitis   in those  on sitagliptin   and incretin  mimetics have  been  reported however   cause  and effect has not been proved As such pancreatitis is more    common in diabetics  as compared to others
Incretin mimetics : main side effects are gastro intestinal  intolerance . These can be  reduced by starting the therapy  with smaller dose and subsequently stepping up Pancreatitis has been reported   in rare  cases.
Bromocriptin: Gastro intestinal intolerance is not uncommon The prevalence   and severity is reduced by starting with lower  dose and stepping up after  one week. Giddiness and postural  hypotension  is seen in some patients . Bromocriptine  should be avoided in those  on other  ergot  agents  antipsychotic  agents  and dopamine antagonists.
Drug  Interactions
These  occur mainly with sulphonylureas Alcohol intolerance occurs in a number   of patients  particularly those on chlorpropamide Many drugs  potentiate hypoglycemic   effects of sulphonylureas. These   include clofibrate Dicumarol  large doses of salcylates  Beta  blockers   NSAIDs  and Biguanides In those  taking biguanides  the risk of lactic acidosis increases if they consume alcohol.


 The  entire work was a joint  effort of ADA EASD  IDF and IFCC .

In order in express average blood glucose  in patient  friendly and meaningful manner a large multi centric multinational work was carried out in 700 persons . 300 each had type 1 and 2 diabetes and 100 were normal controls Originally 11  centers  spread across North America Europe Africa  and Asia  were included . One centre dropped out   due to technical reasons.

 Those  having conditions such as anemia haemoglobinopathies and renal impairment  were  excluded from eh study  A large amount   of data on glycemic control was generated in these people by studying  was generated in these  people by studding them for 4 months  in this period   all were subjected
It is proposed that in future IFCC  will standardize and cal liberate    all the equipment used for estimation  of HbA1c  and also officially release the mathematical formula subsequently the laboratories  will give  report in HbA1c    formal  expressed in %  as currently done in mmol/L  format as well as in ear in mg%  format.
In other words HbA1c   will not be done away  with but will  be  standardized and cal liberated by IFCC method  . In addition eAG  in mg% will be calculated by mathematical  formula and given along with HbA1c  report as an additional value 7%  HbA1c  will be equivalent to 154  mg%  of glucose instead of 150mg% as at present . Hence in future indicators of long  term glycemic control and spot  or point of time  glycemic  control will be expressed in same  units. This move will be very much patient  friendly

No comments:

Post a Comment