When to screen in Indian context?? At 16, 24 & 32 weeks:
The
prevalence of GDM in our country was 16.55%GDM is a compensated metabolic
abnormality &
DIPSI guidelines & also ADA guidelines
aim at foetal long term benefit can prevent
Obesity, IGT and Diabetes in the offspring & possibly little attention is paid
for maternal temporary short term compl.
A) first at16th week of::B) Second screen : 24th – 28th week and finally
C) around 32nd – 34thweek. Using a different glucose challenge in pregnant
versus non-pregnant patients leads to
confusion in the laboratory and may result in errors in applying the proper diagnostic criteria .The
expected weight gain during pregnancy is 300 to 400 gm/week and total
weight gain 10 to 12 kg by term. ADA)
recommends two step procedures for
screening and diagnosis of diabetes and that too in selective (high
risk) population. Combination of regular and intermediate acting insulin
before dinner may be necessary if fasting blood sugar is high. This
combination of short and intermediate acting insulin in the morning and as well
as in the evening is known as mixed and split dose of insulin regimen
Q.
1, Screen all women :-The Diabetes In Pregnancy Study group India (DIPSI)”has
issued practice guidelines for GDM in
the Indian environment. Due to high prevalence, screening is essential for all Indian pregnant women.
Q. 2: What is the recommendation of Study Group formed in
2002:-?? Ans: Between 24 and 28 weeks . -DIPSI recommends 2 hr PPBS after 75 Glucose -(to be
taken in empty stomach) that as
a pregnant woman walks into the antenatal clinic in the fasting state, she has to be given a 75g oral glucose load and at 2 hrs a venous blood
sample is collected for estimating plasma glucose. This one step procedure
of challenging women with 75 gm glucose and diagnosing GDM is simple,
economical and feasible.
Q.3;When to screen??
Between
24 and 28 weeks. Screening is
recommended between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation and the diagnostic criteria of
ADA (American Diabetic Association) are applicable. But, DIPSI members mentioned
that a team approach is ideal for managing women with GDM.
Summary
of the DIPSI:-What we the obstetricians must know:- Take home message from the
“The Diabetes In Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI)” Total 5
recommendations:-of - A) Implementation of DIPSI is like intelligent investment for future long term health benefit
of foetus and not mother, If followed in
preg can prevent Obesity, IGT and Diabetes in the offspring
can fairly be prevented by a short term
intensive care in pregnancy gives a long
term pay off in the primary prevention of as the preventive medicine starts
before birth. (DIPSI guidelines
therefore aim at foetal long term benefit)
B) DIPSI recommends 2hr PPBS after 75 Glucose -(to be taken in empty
stomach) that as a pregnant woman
walks into the antenatal clinic in the
fasting state, she has to be given a 75g oral
glucose load and at 2 hrs a venous blood sample C) ”Intensive
monitoring by , diet and insulin
are the corner stone of GDM
management D) They , at that
time 2002 expressed doubts and concerns on the efficacy of oral agents or analogues. At that time during the study period ( 2002)
use of ODA(oral Aantidiabetics ) use in GDM was controversial though their use
now slowly being established ..
Until there is evidence to absolutely prove
that ignoring maternal hyperglycemia when the fetal growth patterns appear
normal on the ultrasonogram, it is prudent to achieve and maintain normoglycemia in every pregnancy complicated by gestational
diabetes. The maternal health and fetal outcome depends upon the care by
the committed team of diabetologists, obstetricians and neonatologists.
SCREENING
|
A) first at16th week of::B) Second screen : 24th – 28th week and
finally C) around 32nd – 34thweek.
|
Methodà1::
|
DIPSI
Recommended Method
As a pregnant woman walks into the antenatal
clinician the fasting state, she has to be given a 75 g oral glucose load and
at 2 hrs a venous blood sample is collected for estimating plasma glucose.
This one step procedure of challenging women with 75 gm glucose and
diagnosing GDM is simple, economical and feasible
|
Methodà 2:: ADA ::DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
|
This ADA timings and design of
that study including glucose load
was meant primarily to diagnose and pick up women who are prone to develop DM in future and do
not refer to possibility of wellbeing of foetus .American Diabetes Association (Carpenter
and Couston) recommends 3 hour 100 gm OGTT and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
is diagnosed if any 2 values meet or exceed FPG > 95 mg/dl, 1 hr PG >
180mg/dl, 2 hr PG > 155 mg/dl and 3 hr PG > 140 mg/dl. This criteria was originally validated
against the future risk of these
women developing diabetes and not on the fetal outcome. ADA:- ADA:- What’s wrong with ADA method??
American
Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends two
step procedures for screening and diagnosis of diabetes and
that too in selective (high risk) population. Compared with selective
screening, universal screening for GDM detects more cases and improves
maternal and neonatal prognosis..
Carpenter himself now recommends a
2 hour OGTT with 75 gm glucose. The reason for this is that
“when a glucose tolerance test is administered to non-pregnant individuals,
it is standard to use the 75-g, 2-hour OGTT. Using a different glucose
challenge in pregnant versus non-pregnant patients leads to confusion in the
laboratory and may result in errors in
applying the proper diagnostic criteria. Further, the 75-g, 2-hour
OGTT is in use during pregnancy in many countries around the world, typically
using the same thresholds as in non-pregnant individuals”. Depending on the risk of the women developing
diabetes and not on the fetal outcome.
American Diabetes Association (Carpenter and Couston) recommends 3
hour 100 gm OGTT and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus is diagnosed if any 2
values meet or exceed FPG > 95 mg/dl, 1 hr PG > 180 mg/ dl, 2 hr PG
> 155 mg/dl and 3 hr PG > 140 mg/dl. This criterion was originally validated
against the future
risk of these women developing diabetes and not
on the fetal outcome. Carpenter himself now recommends a 2 hour OGTT with 75
gm glucose. The reason for this is that “when a glucose tolerance test is
administered to non-pregnant individuals, it is standard to use the 75-g, 2-hour
OGTT. Using a different glucose challenge in pregnant versus non-pregnant
patients leads to
confusion in the laboratory and may result
in errors in applying the proper diagnostic criteria. Further, the 75-g,
2-hour OGTT is in use during pregnancy in many countries around the world,
typically using the same thresholds as in non-pregnant individuals”.
Methodà 3 :- A) first at16th
week of::B) Second screen : 24th –
28th week and finally C) around 32nd – 34thweek. WHO:-:-the World Health
Organisation (WHO)To
standardize the diagnosis of GDM, the World Health Organisation (WHO)
proposed using a 2 hour 75 gm OGTT with a threshold plasma glucose
concentration of greater than 140 mg/dl at 2 hour, similar to that of IGT,
outside pregnancy. Still all these recommendations (ADA and WHO) have not projected
the influence of the glycemic level on fetal outcome.
To
standardize the diagnosis of GDM, the World Health Organisation (WHO) proposed using a 2 hour
75 gm OGTT with a threshold plasma
glucose concentration of greater than 140 mg/dl at 2 hour, similar to
that of IGT, outside pregnancy.
The fallacy is still on as all these recommendations
(ADA and WHO) have not projected the influence of the glycemic level on fetal outcome.
|
Clarity
in Labeling The Different Magnitude of Abnormal Glucose Intolerance on
Pregnancy
|
Increasing
maternal carbohydrate intolerance in pregnant women without GDM is associated
with a graded increase in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes implying that fetal
morbidity starts at a lower maternal glycemic level (< 140 mg/dl). A
number of prospective and retrospective studies have substantiated the
observation that the frequency of adverse fetal outcome increases with 2hr PG
> 120mg/dl .
Surprisingly, taking care of these women had
resulted in a better fetal outcome. Thus, the data is robust and indicates that
2 hr > 120mg/dl needs cognizance.
|
The
term ‘Impaired Gestational Glucose Tolerance (IGGT)’ is used by few
authors to indicate pregnant women
whose 2 hr PG is > 120mg/dl but below 140 mg/dl. . It may be appropriate
to use the term ‘Decreased
Gestational glucose tolerance (DGGT)’
instead of impaired gestational glucose tolerance.
The
use of the term ‘Decreased’ is appropriate as it implies only ‘Low’
whereas the term ‘Impaired’ means both high and low. Further, quiet
frequently we come across, labeling any
abnormal value in the OGTT not meeting the diagnostic criteria of GDM
as IGT. The use of this term ‘IGT’ during pregnancy may be confusing, as this
terminology is also being used in non pregnant adult with 2 hr PG >
140mg/dl.
This
level is also applied to diagnose GDM by WHO criteria. Hence it may be
prudent to label 2 hr plasma glucose value > 140 mg/dl as GDM
and a 2 hr plasma glucose value > 120
mg/dl as ‘Decreased Gestational Glucose Tolerance’ (DGGT).
The
term IGT should not be used to denote any abnormal value during pregnancy.
The figures suggested below are easy to remember.
|
With 75 gm OGTT (WHO criteria);
|
|
In
Pregnancy
|
Outside
Pregnancy
|
2 hr = 140 mg/dl
2 hr = 120 mg/dl
|
Diabetes
GDM (2 hr = 200 mg/dl
DGGT
|
Diabetes
IGT
—
|
|
Gestational
Weeks at Which Screening is Recommended
|
Screen
timings: A) first
at16th week of::B) Second screen :
24th – 28th week and finally C) around 32nd – 34thweek.20
-
Practically all the pregnant women should
undergo screening for glucose intolerance. The usual recommendation for screening is between
24 and 28weeks of gestation. The recent concept is to screen for glucose intolerance in
the first trimester itself as the fetal beta cell recognizes and responds to
maternal glycemic level as early
as 16th week of gestation. If found negative at this time, the screening test is to
be performed again around 24th – 28th week and finally around 32nd –
34thweek.
The maternal metabolic adaptation is to maintain
the mean fasting plasma glucose of
74.5 ± 11 mg/dl and the post
prandial peak of 108.7 ± 16.9mg/dl.
This fine tuning of glycemic level during pregnancy is
possible due to the compensatory hyperinsulinaemia, as the normal pregnancy
is characterized by insulin resistance. A pregnant woman who is not able to
increase her insulin secretion to overcome the insulin resistance that occurs
even during normal pregnancy develops gestational diabetes. GDM recurs approximately in 50% of subsequent
pregnancies. The future risk of developing diabetes for age gestational
diabetic is twofold, if she becomes overweight. But maintaining ideal
weight approximately halves the risk. The requirement of insulin in
addition to diet to maintain euglycemic during the index pregnancy is also predictive of future
diabetes.
|
|
+
|
|
The metabolic goals of
pregnancy are
1) in early pregnancy to develop anabolic stores to meet metabolic
demands in late pregnancy and
2) in late pregnancy to provide fuels
for fetal growth and energy needs.
-
|
|
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is defined as ‘carbohydrate intolerance with
recognition or onset during pregnancy’, irrespective of the treatment with
diet or insulin. The importance of GDM is that two generation is at risk of developing diabetes in the
future. Women with a history of GDM
are at increased risk of future
diabetes, predominately type 2 diabetes, as are their children. The maternal health and fetal outcome depends upon the
care by the committed team of diabetologists, obstetricians and
neonatologists. A short term intensive
care gives a long term pay off in the primary prevention of obesity,
IGT and diabetes in the offspring, as the preventive medicine starts before
birth.
|
GDM occurs when the woman’s
beta cell function is notable to overcome the antagonism created by the
anti-insulin hormones of
pregnancy and the increased fuel consumption required to provide for the growing
fetomaternal unit.-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When to screen in Indian context?? At 16, 24 & 32 weeks:
The
prevalence of GDM in our country was 16.55%GDM is a compensated metabolic
abnormality &
DIPSI guidelines & also ADA guidelines
aim at foetal long term benefit can prevent
Obesity, IGT and Diabetes in the offspring & possibly little attention is paid
for maternal temporary short term compl.
A) first at16th week of::B) Second screen : 24th – 28th week and finally
C) around 32nd – 34thweek. Using a different glucose challenge in pregnant
versus non-pregnant patients leads to
confusion in the laboratory and may result in errors in applying the proper diagnostic criteria .The
expected weight gain during pregnancy is 300 to 400 gm/week and total
weight gain 10 to 12 kg by term. ADA)
recommends two step procedures for
screening and diagnosis of diabetes and that too in selective (high
risk) population. Combination of regular and intermediate acting insulin
before dinner may be necessary if fasting blood sugar is high. This
combination of short and intermediate acting insulin in the morning and as well
as in the evening is known as mixed and split dose of insulin regimen
Q.
1, Screen all women :-The Diabetes In Pregnancy Study group India (DIPSI)”has
issued practice guidelines for GDM in
the Indian environment. Due to high prevalence, screening is essential for all Indian pregnant women.
Q. 2: What is the recommendation of Study Group formed in
2002:-?? Ans: Between 24 and 28 weeks . -DIPSI recommends 2 hr PPBS after 75 Glucose -(to be
taken in empty stomach) that as
a pregnant woman walks into the antenatal clinic in the fasting state, she has to be given a 75g oral glucose load and at 2 hrs a venous blood
sample is collected for estimating plasma glucose. This one step procedure
of challenging women with 75 gm glucose and diagnosing GDM is simple,
economical and feasible.
Q.3;When to screen??
Between
24 and 28 weeks. Screening is
recommended between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation and the diagnostic criteria of
ADA (American Diabetic Association) are applicable. But, DIPSI members mentioned
that a team approach is ideal for managing women with GDM.
Summary
of the DIPSI:-What we the obstetricians must know:- Take home message from the
“The Diabetes In Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI)” Total 5
recommendations:-of - A) Implementation of DIPSI is like intelligent investment for future long term health benefit
of foetus and not mother, If followed in
preg can prevent Obesity, IGT and Diabetes in the offspring
can fairly be prevented by a short term
intensive care in pregnancy gives a long
term pay off in the primary prevention of as the preventive medicine starts
before birth. (DIPSI guidelines
therefore aim at foetal long term benefit)
B) DIPSI recommends 2hr PPBS after 75 Glucose -(to be taken in empty
stomach) that as a pregnant woman
walks into the antenatal clinic in the
fasting state, she has to be given a 75g oral
glucose load and at 2 hrs a venous blood sample C) ”Intensive
monitoring by , diet and insulin
are the corner stone of GDM
management D) They , at that
time 2002 expressed doubts and concerns on the efficacy of oral agents or analogues. At that time during the study period ( 2002)
use of ODA(oral Aantidiabetics ) use in GDM was controversial though their use
now slowly being established ..
Until there is evidence to absolutely prove
that ignoring maternal hyperglycemia when the fetal growth patterns appear
normal on the ultrasonogram, it is prudent to achieve and maintain normoglycemia in every pregnancy complicated by gestational
diabetes. The maternal health and fetal outcome depends upon the care by
the committed team of diabetologists, obstetricians and neonatologists.
SCREENING
|
A) first at16th week of::B) Second screen : 24th – 28th week and
finally C) around 32nd – 34thweek.
|
Methodà1::
|
DIPSI
Recommended Method
As a pregnant woman walks into the antenatal
clinician the fasting state, she has to be given a 75 g oral glucose load and
at 2 hrs a venous blood sample is collected for estimating plasma glucose.
This one step procedure of challenging women with 75 gm glucose and
diagnosing GDM is simple, economical and feasible
|
Methodà 2:: ADA ::DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
|
This ADA timings and design of
that study including glucose load
was meant primarily to diagnose and pick up women who are prone to develop DM in future and do
not refer to possibility of wellbeing of foetus .American Diabetes Association (Carpenter
and Couston) recommends 3 hour 100 gm OGTT and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
is diagnosed if any 2 values meet or exceed FPG > 95 mg/dl, 1 hr PG >
180mg/dl, 2 hr PG > 155 mg/dl and 3 hr PG > 140 mg/dl. This criteria was originally validated
against the future risk of these
women developing diabetes and not on the fetal outcome. ADA:- ADA:- What’s wrong with ADA method??
American
Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends two
step procedures for screening and diagnosis of diabetes and
that too in selective (high risk) population. Compared with selective
screening, universal screening for GDM detects more cases and improves
maternal and neonatal prognosis..
Carpenter himself now recommends a
2 hour OGTT with 75 gm glucose. The reason for this is that
“when a glucose tolerance test is administered to non-pregnant individuals,
it is standard to use the 75-g, 2-hour OGTT. Using a different glucose
challenge in pregnant versus non-pregnant patients leads to confusion in the
laboratory and may result in errors in
applying the proper diagnostic criteria. Further, the 75-g, 2-hour
OGTT is in use during pregnancy in many countries around the world, typically
using the same thresholds as in non-pregnant individuals”. Depending on the risk of the women developing
diabetes and not on the fetal outcome.
American Diabetes Association (Carpenter and Couston) recommends 3
hour 100 gm OGTT and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus is diagnosed if any 2
values meet or exceed FPG > 95 mg/dl, 1 hr PG > 180 mg/ dl, 2 hr PG
> 155 mg/dl and 3 hr PG > 140 mg/dl. This criterion was originally validated
against the future
risk of these women developing diabetes and not
on the fetal outcome. Carpenter himself now recommends a 2 hour OGTT with 75
gm glucose. The reason for this is that “when a glucose tolerance test is
administered to non-pregnant individuals, it is standard to use the 75-g, 2-hour
OGTT. Using a different glucose challenge in pregnant versus non-pregnant
patients leads to
confusion in the laboratory and may result
in errors in applying the proper diagnostic criteria. Further, the 75-g,
2-hour OGTT is in use during pregnancy in many countries around the world,
typically using the same thresholds as in non-pregnant individuals”.
Methodà 3 :- A) first at16th
week of::B) Second screen : 24th –
28th week and finally C) around 32nd – 34thweek. WHO:-:-the World Health
Organisation (WHO)To
standardize the diagnosis of GDM, the World Health Organisation (WHO)
proposed using a 2 hour 75 gm OGTT with a threshold plasma glucose
concentration of greater than 140 mg/dl at 2 hour, similar to that of IGT,
outside pregnancy. Still all these recommendations (ADA and WHO) have not projected
the influence of the glycemic level on fetal outcome.
To
standardize the diagnosis of GDM, the World Health Organisation (WHO) proposed using a 2 hour
75 gm OGTT with a threshold plasma
glucose concentration of greater than 140 mg/dl at 2 hour, similar to
that of IGT, outside pregnancy.
The fallacy is still on as all these recommendations
(ADA and WHO) have not projected the influence of the glycemic level on fetal outcome.
|
Clarity
in Labeling The Different Magnitude of Abnormal Glucose Intolerance on
Pregnancy
|
Increasing
maternal carbohydrate intolerance in pregnant women without GDM is associated
with a graded increase in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes implying that fetal
morbidity starts at a lower maternal glycemic level (< 140 mg/dl). A
number of prospective and retrospective studies have substantiated the
observation that the frequency of adverse fetal outcome increases with 2hr PG
> 120mg/dl .
Surprisingly, taking care of these women had
resulted in a better fetal outcome. Thus, the data is robust and indicates that
2 hr > 120mg/dl needs cognizance.
|
The
term ‘Impaired Gestational Glucose Tolerance (IGGT)’ is used by few
authors to indicate pregnant women
whose 2 hr PG is > 120mg/dl but below 140 mg/dl. . It may be appropriate
to use the term ‘Decreased
Gestational glucose tolerance (DGGT)’
instead of impaired gestational glucose tolerance.
The
use of the term ‘Decreased’ is appropriate as it implies only ‘Low’
whereas the term ‘Impaired’ means both high and low. Further, quiet
frequently we come across, labeling any
abnormal value in the OGTT not meeting the diagnostic criteria of GDM
as IGT. The use of this term ‘IGT’ during pregnancy may be confusing, as this
terminology is also being used in non pregnant adult with 2 hr PG >
140mg/dl.
This
level is also applied to diagnose GDM by WHO criteria. Hence it may be
prudent to label 2 hr plasma glucose value > 140 mg/dl as GDM
and a 2 hr plasma glucose value > 120
mg/dl as ‘Decreased Gestational Glucose Tolerance’ (DGGT).
The
term IGT should not be used to denote any abnormal value during pregnancy.
The figures suggested below are easy to remember.
|
With 75 gm OGTT (WHO criteria);
|
|
In
Pregnancy
|
Outside
Pregnancy
|
2 hr = 140 mg/dl
2 hr = 120 mg/dl
|
Diabetes
GDM (2 hr = 200 mg/dl
DGGT
|
Diabetes
IGT
—
|
|
Gestational
Weeks at Which Screening is Recommended
|
Screen
timings: A) first
at16th week of::B) Second screen :
24th – 28th week and finally C) around 32nd – 34thweek.20
-
Practically all the pregnant women should
undergo screening for glucose intolerance. The usual recommendation for screening is between
24 and 28weeks of gestation. The recent concept is to screen for glucose intolerance in
the first trimester itself as the fetal beta cell recognizes and responds to
maternal glycemic level as early
as 16th week of gestation. If found negative at this time, the screening test is to
be performed again around 24th – 28th week and finally around 32nd –
34thweek.
The maternal metabolic adaptation is to maintain
the mean fasting plasma glucose of
74.5 ± 11 mg/dl and the post
prandial peak of 108.7 ± 16.9mg/dl.
This fine tuning of glycemic level during pregnancy is
possible due to the compensatory hyperinsulinaemia, as the normal pregnancy
is characterized by insulin resistance. A pregnant woman who is not able to
increase her insulin secretion to overcome the insulin resistance that occurs
even during normal pregnancy develops gestational diabetes. GDM recurs approximately in 50% of subsequent
pregnancies. The future risk of developing diabetes for age gestational
diabetic is twofold, if she becomes overweight. But maintaining ideal
weight approximately halves the risk. The requirement of insulin in
addition to diet to maintain euglycemic during the index pregnancy is also predictive of future
diabetes.
|
|
+
|
|
The metabolic goals of
pregnancy are
1) in early pregnancy to develop anabolic stores to meet metabolic
demands in late pregnancy and
2) in late pregnancy to provide fuels
for fetal growth and energy needs.
-
|
|
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is defined as ‘carbohydrate intolerance with
recognition or onset during pregnancy’, irrespective of the treatment with
diet or insulin. The importance of GDM is that two generation is at risk of developing diabetes in the
future. Women with a history of GDM
are at increased risk of future
diabetes, predominately type 2 diabetes, as are their children. The maternal health and fetal outcome depends upon the
care by the committed team of diabetologists, obstetricians and
neonatologists. A short term intensive
care gives a long term pay off in the primary prevention of obesity,
IGT and diabetes in the offspring, as the preventive medicine starts before
birth.
|
GDM occurs when the woman’s
beta cell function is notable to overcome the antagonism created by the
anti-insulin hormones of
pregnancy and the increased fuel consumption required to provide for the growing
fetomaternal unit.-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment