Cytology based
screening programmes are labour intensive and logistically burdensome. They require multiple
visits by the women for various reasons like screening obtaining the results
follow up investigations and treatment in cases of abnormal smears . Many
programmatic aspects need to be taken into consideration for the programme to
achieve the maximum potential public health benefit such as compliance of the
women to the screening procedures obtaining an adequate smear transport of
samples to the nearest secondary or tertiary care facility for further
processing and analysis. Thus despite the low consumables cost high quality cytology is expensive
in absolute terms and may not necessarily be the most cost effective option for
screening several new technologies like the liquid based cytology and the
automated pap smears are being explored.
In liquid cytology the
cells are collected using a very small brush that is broken off into a small
pot containing
preservative solution. In the cytology
laboratory the sample is filtered or centrifuged to remove excess blood and
debris and the cells are then transferred to the slide in a mono layer thus
obtaining uniformity of the cell
population in each sample. It has logistical and operational advantages
such as interpretation at higher speed lower rate of unsatisfactory smears and
possibility of ancillary molecular testing using remnant fluid. LBC is more
expensive than conventional cytology and requires additional supplies and
sophisticated equipment. In a meta analysis comparing conventional pap with LBC
no difference was found in the relative sensitivity. Similarly no difference was found in the
relative specificity when high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and low
grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were considered as cutoff . But a lower pooled specificity was found for
LBC when presence of atypical squamous cells of underdetermined significance
and above were included .
In Automated pap smears
testing the material on the slide is reviewed and scored based on an algoilthm
. This includes variety of visual characteristics such as shape and optical
density of the cells as to the likelihood of an abnormality being present . Auto pap selects a sample of slides
for manual re screening that are enriched with abnormalities thereby including
most of the slides that exceed a certain threshold for the likelihood of
abnormal cells in contrast to random rescreening In autocyte screen a human reviewer after looking at the
various cell images that are presented determines whether a manual review is
required. The reviewer needs to enter an opinion . if the findings of
both the reviewer and the computer are reported as normal then no further
review is needed and the diagnosis is reported as within normal limits . Manual
review is undertaken for cases which are designated by either the cytologist or
the computer ranking as abnormal.
Visual
Inspection Methods
It has been
difficult to establish and maintain effective cervical cytology programs in developing
countries due to lack of resources trained man power infrastructure and the
requirement of multiple visits. Hence alternative low cost and effective
screening methods based on visual examination of the cervix that require simple
equipment and relatively brief training have
been explored for the control of cervical cancer in low resource
settings.
No comments:
Post a Comment