Saturday, 9 November 2019

Foetal Growth Restriction-Fallacies of Ultrasonography.




ABC of FGR : Can we make mistakes and over treat a normally growing foetus??

Opinion & clinical experiences of the members:- We have never asked ourselves why
How accurate is USG in picking up FGR in pregnancies which are well dated?? Exciting developments
Ans:-  Even if all the parameters   are used then also there can be   missing of some FGR   fetuses.

Limitations ore fallacies of USG as a means of diagnosing FGR!!!  Ans:- Not only missing some cases of FGR by USG  it is equally possible that ,even   if all the measurements are   used then too  there is a possibility that 15-75 % of normal  fetuses will exhibit abnormal   USG   parameters and will be considered as FGR

 ? The role of   USG , Doppler in particularly    in the diagnosis  / prediction of  FGR.  Definition: Intra uterine growth retardation (FGR)  is defined    when the intrauterine   weight of the foetus falls below the    tenth percentile for the specified gest age (  ie. duration  of pregnancy ) . Thus the precondition   of diagnosis of FGR   demands   accurate pregnancy   dating. The other   index of expressing IUGR is when the estimated foetal weight falls below the two standard deviation below the mean.
A) How best to calculate the dating??  Ans:-LMP must be remembered correctly and cycles must be regular, . If these are normal then hopefully dating if gestation can be done correctly .Dating must be done   with great accuracy so that the present estimated foetal weigh  can be compared   with    the reference chart and diagnosis or exclusion of FGR  can be     made. Now for every country there has   been a  population based foetal weight standards are available (Nomograms –Population Based studies)  i e   foetal  weigh as per USG  for each  gestational   age has been   calculated and available to sonographer and quite often   such chart is incorporated in the machine  . Thus before the diagnosis of FGR is made LMP must be known   with certainty. Otherwise false diagnosis of FGR will be made.
B) If  LMP is unknown and neither dating USG or even NT scan are unavailable :--  In such a situation If  LMP is not certain or  unreliable then at least  one obstetric USG  carried out  at 16-18 week of gestation can   be  used as a reference    value  about the duration of preg  ( i e preg dating ) .However the cut off value of diagnosis FGR is 10th  percentile  weight for foetal age against the standard week wt curve.
.Based on the Nomogam the foetus may be :--
A)        Ag A -  appropriate  for  gest age   ( Babies born with birth weight   between the 10 th  and 90th   percentile for gest age
B)         Lg A- Large for gest age  - Foetus     with birth weight  about the 90th  percentile
C)          S gA – small for gest age ( < 10th percentile )
How do we know normal / standard fetal weight  as per gestational week?
To calculate   this (country wise) women with known  LMP   - estimation   of foetal  wt is done at different  gestational age is done. Then   these foetal   weights are plotted against the gest  weeks. These    women must not   have any disease   and birth wt after delay   should be   normal . Thus these pregnancies are essentially normal   in all respects . This is   also called   population standard or “ growth   curve “ or “ Reference Range “ . Thus if a foetus  exhibits 5th percentile for wt  in a particular  gest age ( say 34 weeks )    it means   only 5%  of healthy women of that locality with normal  birth wt  ( proved  later ) will have   such foetal  weight.
Which  term is better ?
FGR  - Foetal Growth Restriction
IUGR=Intra uterine growth restriction  
SFD- Small for date
Growth   restricted foetus
Sg A – small   for gestational  age   . The term retarted  foetus .
Many   women and   their family members think that the very word retardation   of foetus -à what have occurred  in    utero is irreversible   . So  women  &  family  members  got  afraid  of the term retardation .So   the present  nomenclature  of this entity   is growth   restricted foetus  . This means    growth is temporally restricted which is correctable  by proper  treatment  and it is not a permanent / irreversible damage.
  FGR can manifest as a improper increase  in uterine   length( SFH= Symphysis Fundal Height) ,  less maternal abdominal girth, clinically less liquor as felt abdominally   . The USG may reveal  less  Head,  Chest  &  , Abd circumference c , subcut tissues  and muscle mass ( singly  or   in various   combination ) . Ideally all to such   measurements should be done   to diagnose FGR. But in practice   all the diameters / circumferences   are not measured  .

How accurate is USG in picking up FGR in pregnancies which are well dated??
Ans:-  Even if all the parameters   are used then also there can be   missing of some FGR   fetuses.

Limitations ore fallacies of USG as a means of diagnosing FGR!!!  Ans:- Not only missing some cases of FGR by USG  it is equally possible that ,even   if all the measurements are   used then too  there is a possibility that 15-75 % of normal  fetuses will exhibit abnormal   USG   parameters and will be considered as FGR, here lies the role of clinical expertise. .

How obstetricians used to diagnose FGR / SFD  in the decal  of fifties / sixties when USG was not  widely available in India ?
The    then clinicians used to assess foetal  weight by the  followings but unfortunately     in many  cases the presumption of diagnosis   of FGR was  wrong   even by the most   experienced clinicians. Such measurements still do exist are done in each ANC care & clinical examination mostly as a means of abd  palpation of foetus 
1)           Measurement of vertical height (Symphysis  Pubis to Fundal Ht=SFH in cm progressive increase).
è     plotting  these figures symphysis to   fundal ht    measurement   against calculated  gestation age
2)           Obviously there was no way of assessing foetal wt in utero by these ht & maternal abd  circumference measurement only   a rough  gross assement of about  weight   of foetus could be made. Till date there is no monogram which has been prepared with maternal wt gain, SFH in cm or abd circumference in cm  and expected  foetal wt at that time,  However   after the birth of the foetus exact wt can be measured as we always do & follow. .
3)           There   was no way of   exactly knowing the foetal wt before birth. Hence   appropriate   antenatal   treatment for the FGR   baby could not be instituted because diagnosis of FGR   could not be   made antenatally  . Now  with the   advent   of USG  if LMP is certain    or if gestation age  has been calculated in early preg then antenatal diagnosis of FGR    can be   made with   certainly and appropriate treatment  for growth  affected baby can be  instituted  before  the birth of the foetus.
4)           How to express foetal weight against reference   range ?
There   are two methods of expressing foetal wt
1) percentile method
2) Standard deviation method
Classification of Symmetrical  FGR  ( 30 % OF ALL FGR fetuses) ) : All the  parts of  body  are symmetrically    reduced  I e  head   trunk limbs . In such cases the foetus is termed as  symmetrical IUGR 
Asymmetrical FGR( 70% of all FGR fetuses)
When the foetal  head is disproportionately  larger than the other   parts of  body e.g. trunk  limbs  . This is also called “Head sparing  IUGR “ --:  because  in this type if   FGR   dimensions   of head  usually remains   unaffected . Placental      insufficiency   is the main cause in  this subtype   of IUGR. There is preferential blood flow to the foetal   brain and that is the  basis of Doppler  study in IUGR .
Causes of IUGR in asymmetric form
1)           Previous  h/O  IUGR
2)           Hypertensive  disorders of Preg
3)           Smoking
4)           Idiopathic
5)           Uterine  anomaly 
6)           Tumours in Uterus 
7)           A.P.H  / Cardiac / Renal  diseases of  mother
8)           multiple gestation
Why we are  worried about IUGR ? What is the significance of diagnostic of FGR
The complication of FGR foetus (    before  birth ) and FGR    or growth  affected body   after   birth are  as follows
1)           Ill effects of FGR on the course of pregancy & labour  :   Premature   delivery
2)           Asphyxia
3)           IUFD
4)           Still birth
So, to conclude let us agree that uncertainty remains in the diagnosis of FGR even by USG  done  by experts and therefore we to have to keep   our fingers crossed and hoping for arrival of yet another device to be introduced which will exactly inform us about the foetal wt with great precision, more accurate than current USG technology ,But that should be affordable are producible and  harmless to foetus and ease of op[keratin by ward nurses.




No comments:

Post a Comment